Volendo migliorare il layout dell'acquario ho tentato di fare un analisi di quello esistente.
Per fare questo ho imitato la tecnica di analisi descritta nel blog Aquatic Eden .
Before analyzing the current layout I wanted to take the initial project in order to compare the deviations from the idea of \u200b\u200bbasic ...
The initial project was a decidedly triangular shape created with the help of a mixture of wood and rocks. The focus should be on the rocks hidden by the growth of a plant character that initially assumed to be a plant like a rose. This plan included a meadow on the right with a filler item that was to be a Cardamine Lyrata.
This certainly is a formal error compared to the triangular design but I was convinced that the "lightness" of this plant should not have to disturb the overall design.
In hindsight I can say that this is a mistake because the Cardamine with his sprawl and not easily controllable is unsuitable for a formal layout.
The plants were allowed to start a layout compared to triangle but we could see an element of visual impairment: The hinge cover on the right, when it is not hidden, it is really bad. To hide it, I introduced the Cardamine and other plants on the right side leaving the triangular layout ...
As shown in the picture below, except the need for pruning the layout is committed to U. ..
From the track made in the photo the concavity is moved far to the left of the focal point. This is not a big problem since the blanks on the right suggest that proper pruning can balance this shift to the right.
A little more serious is the fact that the growth of 'Hemianthus micranthemoides has covered the hollow between two rocks to the right and shifted the focus remained on the only rock visible.
The presence of two other focal points of the secondary does not improve the situation because it does not correspond with the major points of the golden section.
At this point I tried to figure out where the observer is guided through the vision of bath. Here things get confusing ...
The eye is guided in different directions is the play of light and shade is the position of the stems of plants that power is not addressed in a harmonious way. In this case the party needs a major revision is to the right. Finally
is useful to highlight the plans of the depth:
The background (in blue) is correct after all and can be improved by pruning.
The first floor (green) and second (yellow) in a couple of points are not clearly identifiable.
In particular, the large central clump of moss has been included in the second floor, but since the two plants Anubias seem to be part of a single "level", the trunk behind a plan to add too much respect to the background.
In contrast, the excessive height of the bush in question makes it impossible to include it visually in the foreground.
It will be enough to understand so if a drastic pruning of the moss, or if it is preferable to the complete elimination of the bush which, moreover, seems particularly attached to filamentous algae.
In conclusion, the concave layout is almost essential because of the unsightly hinges of the lid.
The plants should be pruned in the background to rearrange the layout.
The second floor needs to be reviewed right to improve the flow on the left to restore the correct focal point. The moss
bush in the foreground is completely reconsidered. Finally
: still missing a lawn in the foreground ...
by Rudi Giacomini Pilon 
0 comments:
Post a Comment